Sunday, November 24, 2024
League of Power

The League of power


"Brought to you by Global Liberty News"

Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content test

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More


Pure Evil: Vermont Supreme Court Says Schools Can Jab Kids without Parental Consent

Little boy receives a vaccination in the doctors office.

The Vermont Supreme Court has ruled that public schools are protected from liability if they forcibly inject children with the COVID shots without the parents’ consent. Any parent in Vermont who does not want their underage child to be forcibly injected with the toxic mRNA COVID shots needs to pull their child out of school immediately.

This state court ruling appears to violate the recent Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, which declared that the COVID shots are not real vaccines.

Trigger warning: If you’re a parent, this story is going to infuriate you.

 

Dario and Shujen Politella’s 6-year-old son, who is identified simply as L.P. in court documents, was attending the Academy School in the Windham Southeast School District. The school announced that it would be hosting a vaccine clinic in the fall of 2021. District and state school administrators announced that children must have parental consent to receive a COVID jab.

The Politella parents filled out the paperwork and explicitly put it in writing that they did not want L.P. to receive a COVID shot. The week before the vaccine clinic took place, court documents show that Dario Politella made a special trip to the school, just to talk to the vice principal. He told the vice principal that L.P. was not to receive a COVID shot under any circumstance. He wanted to make sure that there was no confusion about this.

So, the Politellas had informed the school both verbally and in writing that they did not consent to L.P. receiving the jab.

On the day of the vaccine clinic, L.P. was taken to the school nurse like a lamb being led to the slaughter. The 6-year-old told the school employees and the nurse that his dad didn’t want him to have a shot.

Court documents show that the school nurse distracted the 6-year-old child with a stuffed animal and then jabbed him in the arm with the Pfizer juice.

The family sued the school, the administrators, and the nurse for violating their rights as parents and for violating the bodily autonomy of their child without consent. A Vermont District Court judge threw the case out. They appealed and now the Vermont Supreme Court has finally ruled in the case this week. The court ruled against the family.

In the ruling Monday, the judges said that the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) shields state and school officials from liability over vaccine injury cases.

“We conclude that when the federal PREP Act immunizes a defendant, the PREP Act bars all state-law claims against that defendant as a matter of law,” said Justice Karen Carroll.

That’s a bit wordy. In plain English, what this means is that schools in Vermont can now forcibly vaccinate any child against their parents’ will, and the parents cannot sue the school for damages. Public schools in Vermont now enjoy the same immunity from lawsuits that Pfizer and Moderna enjoy under the PREP Act.

We sincerely hope that this family appeals the case to the federal courts if they are financially able to. As we reported earlier this summer, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a landmark ruling against the Los Angeles Unified School District for its vaccine mandates. That court ruled that the COVID mRNA shots are not even real vaccines (which we’ve been saying for almost four years now).

They’re made from different materials and the shots do not prevent anyone from catching COVID. They’re not vaccines and therefore they cannot be mandated for anyone by the government.

Do you know what else does not apply if the COVID shots aren’t real vaccines?

The PREP Act! The immunity only applies to government entities administering real vaccines.

The case would go to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals if the Politellas appealed it. That could guarantee a win either way. If the court rules in their favor, they win. If the court decides that COVID shots are vaccines, it creates a dueling federal opinion. The Supreme Court will then have to step in and make a final ruling. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito would probably love to sink their teeth into another landmark ruling like this one.

Unfortunately, it’s going to take years for that to happen if the family appeals the case. In the meantime, every child in a Vermont public school is now in imminent danger. Parents need to know this and they need to get their children out of the public schools.


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

About The Author

8 Comments

Leave A Response

Array